Nintendo had the Zelda timeline planned out in an “enormous document” as far back as 2003, but Shigeru Miyamoto said it’s actually “not that important to us”

The Legend of Zelda timeline was a matter of intense debate in the forums I frequented as a young Nintendo fan, but by the time it was ultimately revealed in the 2011 Hyrule Historia book, I had moved on to caring about topics other than whether there were multiple Links and Zeldas. But Nintendo had a secret document detailing the whole thing all along – even if Shigeru Miyamoto himself didn’t care about it all that much.

“For every Zelda game we tell a new story,” Miyamoto explained in a 2003 interview with the Swedish Superplay Magazine, which was translated and hosted on various corners of the old internet. “But we actually have an enormous document that explains how the game relates to the others, and bind them together. But to be honest, they are not that important to us. We care more about developing the game system.”

I’m one of those skeptics who found the 2011 Hyrule Historia timeline, which split the series into three separate lines that branch from the ending of Ocarina of Time, a little ridiculous. I’m not sure knowing Nintendo had planned its timeline this far back improves my impression of it here in 2026, but I guess I’m glad to know Nintendo had a plan in the first place. Even if, as Miyamoto puts it, it doesn’t actually feel “that important.”

Article continues below

But that’s always been Miyamoto’s take on story in games. “The most important thing for me,” he said in the same interview, “is that the player get sucked into the game. I want the games to be easy to understand, and that the people appreciate the games content, its core. I will never deny the importance of a great story, but the plot should never get that important that it becomes unclear.”