A British-Jordanian doctor has launched a discrimination lawsuit against an NHS trust, alleging that he was suspended from his duties mid-shift over social media posts that were critical of Israel and supportive of Palestinians.
Dr Nadeem Crowe, an A&E doctor with Palestinian family and friends, made the comments on a private X account during his personal time, according to written submissions presented to a central London employment tribunal.
Dr Crowe was suspended from his bank work at the Royal Free Hospital in Camden, north London, in August 2024.
He claims that he was not given specific details regarding the complaint against him.
The doctor said that the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, along with its responsible officer Jane Hawdon, discriminated against him “because of his anti-Zionist beliefs and his manifestation of those beliefs”.
Jude Shepherd, representing the two respondents, told the panel on Tuesday: “The respondents’ primary case … is that there was no disciplinary action.”
On 4 November 2023, under the X account named “Nadeem Haddadin-Crowe” with two Palestinian flags, he posted: “Zionists love calling Hamas fundamentalists but bizarrely can’t see they are too fundamentalists.”
Another, shared a day earlier, said: “Perhaps British Jews should consider how genuine their connection with Israel actually is. Other than the delusion that is Zionism it seems to be a fairly feeble link that leaves those Zionists who haven’t even set foot in Israel thinking their connection to Israel is stronger than the Palestinians.
“It isn’t just the Jews who have ugly history and it takes a pretty awful set of values to weaponise the Holocaust under these circumstances.
“There is a genocide going on as a result of an illegal and violent occupation. Not only in Gaza but in the West Bank.
“Perhaps to Palestine the Nakba is as much an emotional trauma as the Holocaust to the Jews (sic).”
On 7 November that year he said: “Zionists need to stop using Judaism as a human shield.”
A Royal Free employee, who has been kept anonymous in tribunal proceedings, lodged a complaint on 13 August 2024.
According to the respondents’ opening written submissions, the staff member alleged that Dr Crowe’s posts were “absolutely vile, celebrating Hamas and comparing Israel to the Nazis and are very much antisemitic according to the IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) definition of antisemitism ‘drawing comparison of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis’.”
The following day Dr Hawdon emailed Dr Crowe to say concerns had been raised and that his bank status was suspended pending a meeting.
Dr Hawdon has claimed that, during their conversation on 15 August, it appeared Dr Crowe “was not prepared to reflect on his posts or their potential impact in light of the concerns raised”.
Therefore, she told him there would need to be a fact-finding investigation, the opening submissions said.
His bank status would remain suspended during that time which meant he was unable to book any shifts but “steps would be taken to ensure there was no financial impact upon him”, she said she told the doctor.
Dr Crowe has alleged that Dr Hawdon “put implicit pressure on him to delete his social media posts or face a full investigation”.
His suspension was lifted on 16 August after he deleted the posts. He returned to bank work the next day.
Dr Crowe subsequently lodged a grievance about his treatment and claims the trust “failed to address any aspect” of it and the complaint “remains outstanding to this day”.
The respondents’ conduct allegedly “aggravated substantially” his “longstanding and significant” clinical anxiety disorder.
He claims this led to him increasing his medication, starting counselling, and suffering from nightmares and insomnia.
Dr Crowe has said he felt unable to return to his locum work at the hospital as he stopped trusting his colleagues and did not know who complained about him.
The doctor stopped working shifts because of sickness and has not returned since 25 August 2024, the respondents have said.
The respondents said that Dr Hawdon “does not have a policy of subjecting doctors who have made social media publications to disciplinary processes where it is alleged that such publications are antisemitic or breach the IHRA definition of antisemitism, nor does it have a policy of treating criticism of Israeli policy in Palestine as offensive”.
The processes followed with Dr Crowe were informal, they added.
Dr Crowe alleges that he was harassed and directly and indirectly discriminated against in relation to a protected belief.
He further claims to have experienced race-related harassment and direct and indirect race discrimination.
The tribunal continues.
